
There's been a lot of speculation in the last few days that Mike Huckabee was a leading candidate to be John McCain's VP choice. In light of the many arguments both for and against him, do you think Mike Huckabee is the best candidate for McCain to choose? read more »
(must be a site member)
![]()
Rick Santorum wrote a a piece back in April called "The Elephant in the Room: Why conservatives should support McCain"
I read it back in April and remembered it today when I was following the news of John McCain's "Climate Change Plan""
What struck me most of all and reminded me of Santorum's story was his reference to Ronald Reagan's axiom that someone you agree with on 80 percent of the issues is your friend, not your enemy.
I have heard that reference used for a variety of opinions and somehow it seemed to fit them all because it is true.
I do not agree with John McCain on climate change and I do not agree with him on his oposition to drilling in ANWR.
McCain did leave an opening in the debate over how to handle the decision of drilling off the coast of Florida by saying that he was a Federalist and that the decision was something for the States themselves to decide.
Santorum's story is worth a read.
Excerpt:
"I've disagreed with him on immigration, global warming and federal protection of marriage. I've taken strong exception to his view that the federal government should fund embryonic stem-cell research. But disagreement on such issues is one of the reasons we have presidential primaries - so each party's voters can sort out the issues and personalities and choose the candidate who best reflects their collective view. Republicans have done that. Now the question for conservatives is whether McCain fits the Reagan Axiom that someone you agree with on 80 percent of the issues is your friend, not your enemy.
Of all the issues confronting the United States today, none is more important than our nation's security. Although these issues don't dominate our news as they once did, we cannot forget that without a safe and secure country, all other issues don't matter."
-----------------------
For me, I'll continue to support the three legged elephant over the alternative. The "Donkey" just has too many fleas. :)
(must be a site member)
- Nelsa's blog
- Login or register to post comments
McCain advisor Frank Donatelli appeared on Fox's Neil Cavuto and discussed the campaign with Neil.
(must be a site member)
- Nelsa's blog
- Login or register to post comments

According to a top McCain fundraiser, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee is at the top of Senator McCain's VP list.
The fundraiser is less than thrilled with the idea of Huckabee as the vice presidential nominee, and many economic conservatives—turned off by the populist tone of Huckabee's campaign and his tax record as governor—are likely to share that marked lack of enthusiasm. But here is the logic of picking Huckabee:
1) He is a great campaigner and communicator who could both shore up support in the South among social conservatives (Huckabee is a former Baptist minister) and appeal to working-class voters in the critical "Big 10" states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ohio.
2) As any pollster knows, voters search for candidates who "care about people like me," and Huckabee would probably score a lot higher on that quality than millionaire investor Mitt Romney. Plus, given all the turmoil on Wall Street, 2008 would seem to be a bad year to pick a former investment banker for veep.
3) Economic conservatives and supply-siders may balk, but the threat of four years of Obamanomics and higher investment, income, and corporate taxes might be enough to keep them on board.
Let me add that a top Republican political strategist told me about a month ago that he also believed Huckabee to be the leading veep contender.
UPDATE: Reaction from around the blogosphere. Here, here, here and here. Ouch...
(must be a site member)
Here's Senator McCain's latest TV ad regarding climate change.
(must be a site member)
- Lane's blog
- Login or register to post comments
The National Media is ready to "move on" with Barack Obama as their candidate of choice. Of course, they have been ready to do that for months. They seized on his showing in North Carolina last week as their excuse for doing so (although he still only got 37% of the Democratic White Vote).
But some Hillary Clinton supporters are making it clear they will not "move on" to supporting Barack Obama. In fact, listen to this Clinton supporter. I wonder how many feel this way across the nation?
As a Clinton supporter, the spectacle of having Obamites trying to make nice now that they think he's won is revolting. The Obama cabal has behaved in the most disgusting, depraved, adolescent way since this campaign began. Try writing something in support of Clinton on that electronic snot rag the Huffington Post. Try having a reasoned conversation with an Obama supporter and you will know it is, in fact, a personality cult. These are the people who cheered on the mentally unstable Olbermann when he became unhinged about perfectly true comments Ferraro made - comments that echoed John Kerry. The Obamites later had no issue when namby pamby Obama refused to disown his pastor a week later. These are the people who cheered on Rhandi Rhodes when she called the former First Lady a "f***ing whore". The Obama hordes cheered when he flipped off the Senator from New York. The Obama campaign lied about the Clintons and race in South Carolina - cheered on by the cult. The Obama campaign lies about nearly all his past associations - most recently his connection to Hamas. The noise from the Obama campaign and its cabal on worshipers has been overwhelming at times. With the help of self hating gay men like John Avarosis and star f***ers like Arianna Huffington, the sick, immoral media has refused to do its job and created an Obama myth out of mindlessness, sloth, and hatred of strong women. read more »
(must be a site member)
Stanley Kurtz is out with a devastating piece in the May 19 issue of The Weekly Standard in which he proves it is impossible that Barack Obama is telling the truth about what he knew of Rev. Jeremiah Wright's radical anti-American philosophy. Obama has acted as if he is shocked by what Jeremiah Wright said about the United States, and how he acted at The National Press Club last month. Yet, Kurtz proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Obama had to know for years and years of Wright's radical views and felt comfortable enough with those views to remain in the church - even to this day. Here is the first part of Kurtz's article:
To the question of the moment--What did Barack Obama know and when did he know it?--I answer, Obama knew everything, and he's known it for ages. Far from succumbing to surprise and shock after Jeremiah Wright's disastrous performance at the National Press Club, Barack Obama must have long been aware of his pastor's political radicalism. A careful reading of nearly a year's worth of Trumpet Newsmagazine, Wright's glossy national "lifestyle magazine for the socially conscious," makes it next to impossible to conclude otherwise.
Wright founded Trumpet Newsmagazine in 1982 as a "church newspaper"--primarily for his own congregation, one gathers--to "preach a message of social justice to those who might not hear it in worship service." So Obama's presence at sermons is not the only measure of his knowledge of Wright's views. Glance through even a single issue of Trumpet, and Wright's radical politics are everywhere--in the pictures, the headlines, the highlighted quotations, and above all in the articles themselves. It seems inconceivable that, in 20 years, Obama would never have picked up a copy of Trumpet. In fact, Obama himself graced the cover at least once (although efforts to obtain that issue from the publisher or Obama's interview with the magazine from his campaign were unsuccessful). read more »
(must be a site member)
- brianinmo's blog
- Login or register to post comments

With the odds of victory almost down to nil, when do you think we'll see Hillary finally bow out of this contest, and when she does, who will Obama pick for his VP? read more »
(must be a site member)
Here is an RNC ad that hits Obama hard for opposing the Gas Tax Holiday this summer proposed by Sen. John McCain. The ad reveals that Obama supported such a measure previously in Illinois.
(must be a site member)
- brianinmo's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Here is a tremendous new ad put out by the Republican National Committee on Barack Obama. They play on the reality that the Obama campaign try to say virtually everything is off limits in questioning Obama's associations and philosophy. So the ad says, "Can we ask?", and then asks a whole series of questions. It also uses Obama's "Yes We Can" to answer the questions. Great ad!
(must be a site member)







Recent comments
13 hours 45 min ago
13 hours 48 min ago
18 hours 10 min ago
23 hours 46 min ago
23 hours 53 min ago
1 day 11 hours ago
1 day 18 hours ago
4 days 16 hours ago
6 days 18 hours ago
6 days 23 hours ago