
eugenics
I am an independent voter who has been a enthusiastic supporter of John McCain. I believe that Senator McCain is a principled statesman whose political involvement reflects an astute awareness of politics and government as manifestations of society and culture in broad historical context.
I believe that John McCain has a rare ability to not only focus upon seemingly isolated decisions and issues, but to pull back and consider such things in broader context, in terms of cause and effect. I also admire the fact that he is comfortable in trusting his intuition and his inner capacity for compassion; this combination enables an access to the collective consciousness beyond ones own personal experiences.
His inclusion of Governor Palin for this prominent position in his administration, especially in potential combination with certain members of his present circle, further attests to his wisdom and generosity of spirit. The generosity lies in that he has already intuitively bequeathed several timely catalysts for significant, beneficial political and social change through the inner revolution of individual perception, rather than artificial structure, during the process of his campaign for President, rather than undermining such opportunities through the caution and self-censorship that ambition often effects.
No matter the outcome of this election, Governor Palin's candidacy is a very good thing for American society. Your article addresses only one of many crucial reasons why this is so.
The cold truth is that proponents of eugenics don't believe that an infant like Baby Palin is "supposed" to be here. Some would even claim that Palin is selfish for insisting upon allowing her infant to survive.
For some, there is no reason for a "progressive" society to permit such a reminder of natural diversity and what THEY perceive as "imperfection" to impose itself upon society. Some such people cite financial reasons, national or ethnic strength, etc., but what most of them really hate is having a mirror among them that says, quietly yet clearly---that could be me.
Some believe that they cannot afford to experience the introspection, and even pain, that compassion entails; they believe it will make them weak, make society weak.
For such people, Baby Palin is a reminder of frailty, of chance, of mortality. They fear him, they fear they cannot "go there" without disintegrating, without losing themselves. Baby Palin must be reduced, categorized, as an "other."
And here our troubles began, as one author on racism and genocide has said.
Nobody would castigate a Martin Luther King for entrusting Mrs. King with the care of their infant in order for King to advocate a cause on behalf of that infant, to dedicate his gifts to the struggle for human dignity, to the validation of their infant.
I strongly believe that Baby Palin supports the efforts of his mother and family in ensuring that he exists: not only as a living creature, like all of us, in this realm, but that he exists in our collective mind and spirit. A family, a people, a nation, is judged according to how it recognizes the least powerful among its own.
---Laura Semilian

- Laura Semilian's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Obama's adviser Zbig Brzezinski.
The quotes below provide repulsive reading for traditional conservatives, believers of many different faiths, and free-thinkers in general. Anti-war activists and traditional progressives are among those who have been hoodwinked by Obama, Inc.
The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values (like liberty and democracy). Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
- Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, 1970
"In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason."
- Between Two Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic Era - 1970
"This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept." --- Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (It's not that I'm "nationalist". It's that the Bill of Rights will fade away too.)
"What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?" - 1998 interview

- Laura Semilian's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Obama's CHANGE and the Sanctity of the Individual
Why does Obama mock McCain's validation of the Strength of the Fundamentals of the American Economy?
McCAIN BELIEVES THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL (EACH AMERICAN WORKER) IS A FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY. MCCAIN IS AN INDIVIDUALIST. HE BELIEVES THAT A SOCIETY IS BEST-SERVED BY RECOGNIZING AND PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, AS INDIVIDUALS ARE THE FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENTS OF A SOCIETY.
OBAMA IS A COLLECTIVIST. HE BELIEVES THAT STRUCTURES (STATE APPARATUS), NOT INDIVIDUALS, ARE THE DEFINING FUNDAMENTALS OF A SOCIETY. OBAMA DESPISES THE NOTION THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS FUNDAMENTAL.
OBAMA BELIEVES THAT THE "COMMUNITY" (STATE APPARATUS) HAS A RIGHT, EVEN AN OBLIGATION, TO SACRIFICE INDIVIDUALS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE ITS GOALS.
During the Vice Presidential debate, Governor Palin clarified Senator McCain’s ideology, which I share, that the Individual is fundamental. McCain’s assertion that the Fundamentals of the American economy are strong validated the significance and potential of each Fundamental, each Individual.
America, in ideal, manifests this recognition and validation of the Individual. Thus, the American economy is, in ideal, an aspect, an integral reflection of this validation.
Validation of any Individual is anathema to the agenda and political strategy presently represented by Senator Obama, who consistently attempts to undermine Individual notions of singularity, of exceptionalism—the Individual must renounce identity as Fundamental, to accept Category: tribute extolled to the Obama Image.
The Obama campaign and its surrogates continue to mock McCain’s statement, a statement resonating deeply with them; they must not only undermine McCain’s affirmation of the strength of the Fundamental, but denigrate any affirmation of the Individual as Fundamental.
Obama’s very public complaint that McCain did not mention the words “middle class” during last week’s debate reveals much about Obama’s own perception of the world. He does not even realize that many people do not interpret the world by default through the paradigms he and his ideological kindred do.
I wonder how many people watching the Vice Presidential debate started in their seats upon hearing the moderator use the indicative phrase “class warfare.” She was unprovoked in this, and we must remember that she wrote the questions herself. Even though she was asking Biden to prove how Obama’s plan was NOT “class warfare,” why would she even be using vocabulary specific to the very ideology that she was hoping that Biden would allay public disquiet about. Ms. Ifill raised a Red Flag here, and did not even know it.
In his closing statement, Senator Biden chose to strongly emphasize that an Obama Presidency would bring sweeping “fundamental” change.
Senator Biden’s emphasis on the word “fundamental” was a public service announcement.
As an individualist and personalist, I appreciate Senator Biden’s focused disclosure, and take it as the valid warning that it is.

- Laura Semilian's blog
- Login or register to post comments




