
Romney
I just heard a report from Fox News' Carl Cameron. He says the McCain Campaign is trying to keep a lid on the VP Choice. Here's a rundown of what he said:
- McCain has made his pick
- McCain is en route to Dayton, Ohio right now
- Mitt Romney was seen in California leaving for a flight with an overnight bag; may be headed to Dayton, Ohio
- Mike Huckabee is reportedly headed to Dayton, Ohio
- Pawlenty is still very much in the mix
- McCain could still surprise everyone with a name no one has talked about
Cameron said several of the possibilities may show up in Dayton, Ohio - such as Huckabee and Romney - to keep everyone guessing until tomrrow. Cameron is working hard to figure it out tonight.

Have you ever looked at one of the maps of county-by-county Primary Vote Results? They tell the story very clearly.
1) Huckabee dominated the rural areas.
2) McCain dominated the urban areas.
3) Romney competed with McCain for the urban areas and couldn't even touch the rural areas.
Between the 3 of them, the 2 who would complement each other the best is McCain and Huckabee. e.g. Missouri
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#MO
As an added bonus, Clinton voters will be easier to "pick off" this election, so McCain would be wise pick someone who is strong in her geographical areas. If you look, you will see that Obama and Clinton shared the same dynamic. Clinton dominated the rural areas and Obama took the urban areas.
It should be very obvious. If McCain picks Huckabee, HE WILL DEFINITELY WIN.

Fox News' Carl Cameron is reporting that John McCain may announce his Vice-Presidential pick before Friday - the date a rally in Dayton, Ohio is already scheduled. That would mean McCain could announce his selection on Wednesday or Thursday of this week, while the Democratic National Convention is still going on:
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain may announce his choice for a running mate earlier than expected, sources told FOX News on Monday.
McCain had previously said he would announce his vice presidential pick on Friday and would appear with that individual at a rally in Dayton, Ohio, following the announcement. Friday is McCain’s 72nd birthday.
But sources close to McCain’s campaign told FOX News that his decision may come sooner than that — possibly on Thursday, when Barack Obama accepts the Democratic nomination at Invesco field in Denver, Colo.
McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds diminished the news.
“I wouldn’t much weight into reports that there are windows of possibility,” he said.
Several names have come up repeatedly as McCain’s possible running mate, including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge and, perhaps, Democrat-turned-independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. Also named is Gen. David Petraeus, the incoming head of Central Command.
McCain’s camp last month floated the idea that he would announce a running mate while Barack Obama, the expected Democratic presidential nominee, traveled overseas to demonstrate his foreign policy chops. Obama’s trip was widely covered in the press, but McCain’s campaign was able to draw attention back to the Arizona senator, who never ended up naming his choice.
The McCain Campaign is certainly dropping clues that would indicate the pick is going to come before Friday. But it could all be a head fake to keep the media talking about McCain through the week.

McCain is not the best choice if you as me but that is what we got. The campaign better be able to rebut these charges on his flip flopping. The left is ready to chew him on it. Rudy or Romney would have been in my opinion the better candidates. Anyway, check out the link below and how they are beating McCain up and how presuasive they are to the point I don't even feel excited anymore about this election. The other guys seems so organized than the Republicans.
Check this out...
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/flipflops

NBC's Chuck Todd has posted the following as the list of speakers at the upcoming Republican National Convention. It looks like a great lineup!
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani will keynote the Republican National Convention. One-time Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Lieberman will also speak at the Republican convention.
Full list/schedule (Central Time) below:
Overall Theme: Country First
Mon -- Service Day
-- Split sessions 2:30-6 (this is where the rules, platform etc.. will get voted on, including a new primary calendar etc.) ... start again at 7Speakers:
--before prime-time (pre-9pm): Cheney, Lieberman
-- Primetime: Arnold, Laura Bush, George W. BushTues -- Reform Day
-- starts 6:30-7Speakers:
--before prime-time: Ridge, Rosario Marin, Thompson, Lingle, Steele;
--Primetime (9pm central): Palin, Huckabee, the keynoter is Rudy Giuliani.Wed -- Prosperity Day
-- starts 6:30Speakers:
-- pre-prime time: Coleman, Meg Whitman, Fiorina, Romney.
-- Prime time: Cindy McCain leads off, followed by the VP nominee; they will close prime time hour with the McCain nominator: Bobby Jindal... the roll call will take place about 11pm ET... they will roll through.. AZ will pass... AZ will put him over the top... hope to keep within an hour... could go as long as 90 minutes...Thurs --
-- Starts 6:30Speakers:
Pawlenty, Crist, Brownback, Martinez... In prime time: video of McCain, traditional lead-in to the speech... traditional demonstration... whole prime-time hour, packaged together as McCain's speech.During all four nights, sometimes in prime time and sometimes in the early evening hours, McCain will have a presence, meaning a live satellite hookup some nights where McCain says high to folks etc. They are not ready for details but expect that since the backdrop for the podium is a gigantic TV screen.

In reviewing all the possible choices that John McCain would make, it seems to me that speculation seems to be centering around four people -- two men and two women -- Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, and Condi Rice.
I firmly believe Tim Pawlenty, though a competent governor, would be the disaster pick. If he is picked, I can imagine a collective "yawn" from the nation. First of all, he's not even that popular in Minnesota, where a poll indicated more Minnesotans would be less likely to vote for him than to vote for him -- so he actually would help Obama win Minnesota, not McCain. Though I'm sure McCain likes him, what does he had to the ticket? Nothing in my mind, and McCain needs to be mindful of the political consequences of such a choice. He is, right now, like it or not, the underdog and Pawlenty would do nothing to help that image -- in fact, he would enhance it.
Condi Rice would be an incredibly courageous pick and clearly would create a media sensation. I personally have always liked the idea and if Bush was any more popular than 30%, I think she'd be a shoo in. She is helped by the fact that we are now winning the war, and I think in the end the public would trust her with the nation...and like Obama, her winning the VP slot would be historic for blacks. The drawbacks are -- one, she's not been vetted as to many of her views on domestic issues, which are more moderate than not, which would potentially be harmful in McCain's courting of conservatives. Again, like it or not, McCain's campaign isn't exactly setting the world on fire right now, and Condi would be a risk -- would she motivate the masses or make the conservative base more upset? Hard to say. I'd like the choice but not sure that all would. If Condi were firmly pro-life, it would be a different story. Being at a crossroads in our nation regarding the life issue, however, I think that it is important to have someone who can speak on the issue, and speak well.
That brings us to Sarah Palin, the dynamic and gorgeous governor of Alaska. In my view, she would be a "home run" pick. She would motivate women, conservatives (she is rabidly pro-life) and be able to talk with authority on the energy issue, which is the predominant issue on Americans minds. She has been an executive, like Pawlenty, and has been courageous in dealing with lack of ethics in her state (despite what a poster in another thread says -- she may ruffle feathers but that's the sign of leadership to me, not a weak leader). Her ONLY drawback is that she is only recently elected and you could make a case she needs more high level experience. I dont think its much of one, but in the "readiness to be president" issue, I could see it hurting her.
That leaves us with Mitt Romney. Though not a home run or buzz-generator like Palin or Rice, he is a solid pick who would bring conservatives on board and bring crediblity on a host of issues. While the flip flop charge may hurt, I dont think it would as much in the #2 spot. He would also help win Michigan, Colorado, and bring a boatload of bucks to the campaign, which McCain sorely needs if he is going to win. Romney talks well, has no baggage family wise, and is a likeable fellow that I think creates the perfect #2. Also, I have no doubt he could take over if he had too. He is, what I call, the "safe choice" that brings a lot of positives with limited negatives, unites conservatives, and doesn't have the snooze factor of Tim Pawlenty.
So, I say -- while outside of Pawlenty, I would be thrilled with any of the above, and while my dream choice would have been our man Fred Thompson, I hope that John McCain picks Mitt Romney -- simply because he helps create a clear path to victory while also providing competent leadership to the job at hand.
MCCAIN/ROMNEY '08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As I stated in my analysis piece, I have thought quite a bit about McCain's potential VP selections. Assuming he doesn't go with a real wild card like JC Watts, I think out of the standard figures that it should come down to three people:
Condi Rice
Mitt Romney
Mark Sanford
I got to those three "finalists" after doing a little bit of a "primary" among the several groups. Get me the best governor, best national figure, and best former candidate/official. I explained that in my previous blog entry.
After analyzing the three finalists, my initial reaction was to go with Condi Rice. I think it would be an historic pick, and to me, to be honest, makes the most sense. Who could deny that Condi has the experience? The knowledge? She's not politically ambitious yet perhaps a run for VP would give her some. I think she would bring women, moderates, and some minorities.
That said, she is so tied to Bush and I think in the current climate I'm not sure if all the above qualities could overshadow that enough, particularly given Obama's focus on trying to make McCain Bush III.
Sanford is an attractive choice because of his credentials as a conservative, but I don't think he brings you anything (McCain will win SC), and I think McCain needs more of a national figure. I think the public would spend a lot of time getting to know Sanford, and I'm not sure that's wise. read more »

- FredFan4McCain's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1 trackback
Hey all, last week I announced that each week I would make a new post about a potential VP candidate for McCain. Last week, I discussed Condi Rice. You can see that here:
This week, I'm going to discuss Mitt Romney.
Mitt Romney clearly has political aspirations beyond where he is now, and I think he plans on running for President again. It was clear throughout the primary cycle there was some animosity between McCain and Romney, but Mitt ended up taking the high road by getting out before he had to, endorsing McCain in the process.
Was this a calculated move to try to get on the ticket, thus making Mitt the likely successor? After all, the GOP has a history of choosing the "next in line" -- and since McCain has a possibility of only being a one termer, due to age, perhaps Mitt thinks that this would be a good way on the ticket.
The question is -- what does Mitt bring? One might say he brings conservatives, but I'm not so sure. Mitt ran as a conservative, but do conservatives really trust him? Would conservatives really rally around McCain? Aside from that, what state does he bring? McCain is not going to win Massachusetts and would already win Utah, so what else?
The one benefit Romney would bring is executive experience -- along with some knowledge on the economy, which is sure to be an issue this fall.
I don't think Mitt would be a bad choice at all, but I am not sure of the benefit it brings McCain - and Romney would be constantly angling for time, given his own ambition.
Thoughts?
Next Week: Sarah Palin






